[FQP] FQP Mobile Category Rules
n4km at embarqmail.com
Tue May 1 12:40:55 PDT 2007
Here are my comments on the changing of the mobile categories. I think we
need to be careful and not add too many different cats. If we make too many,
every mobile than enters will get a plaque, thus taking away their value. I
am sure we could do some more clarification of some of the rules, but I am
really not in favor of to many categories.
My 2 cents.
Kevin N4KM 1/2 of team OJ in FQP.
From: fqp-bounces at kkn.net [mailto:fqp-bounces at kkn.net] On Behalf Of
K1to at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:41 PM
To: ku8e at bellsouth.net; fqp at kkn.net
Cc: k4bai at worldnet.att.net
Subject: Re: [FQP] FQP Mobile Category Rules
Thanks for your input. Congrats on a very solid effort and thanks for
down to participate again!
1) N4PN's amp puts him into a different power category where he does not
the 2x power multiplier, so I think that example is amply covered now, so to
2) Hauling an antenna on a trailer is nothing new. W5WMU did this years
ago. How on earth can we subdivide mobiles based on antenna size? Is a
trailer-based vertical that significantly better than one mounted on a low
3) The current rules do specify that mobiles should have antennas that are
capable of motion. So the concept of throwing up a dipole or big vertical
some counties is not really consistent with the concept of a mobile. This
where we have a hole in the rules and need further discussion to establish
appropriate rules. I asked this group before to point us to a set of rules
does address this and got zero response.
73, Dan, K1TO
See what's free at
FQP mailing list
Send mail to - FQP at kkn.net
Change/edit subscription info - http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/fqp
FQP Web site - www.floridaqsoparty.org or www.flqp.org
More information about the FQP