[DEMI] Protecting pre-amps
Chris Cox
chrisc@Chris.Org
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:30:50 -0600 (CST)
I usually leave mine on having read that same suggestion by (I think) Al
Ward in the CSVHFS proceedings from Kansas City a few years back. The
reasoning was that the bias causes the threshold of damage onset to be
raised.
I must admit that I haven't run them with switched power so how much of a
real benefit there would be I don't know.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Tree N6TR wrote:
>
> I am working on my "foolproof" sequencing system for mast mounting a
> couple of DEMI's preamps. I seem to remember a discussoin where someone
> suggested that leaving the FETs biased on offered more protection against
> damage than leaving them off.
>
> Since I am planning on running separate conductors for the preamp's power
> and the relays, I could leave them powered up when being disconnected.
>
> Any thoughts or hard experiences to share?
>
> Tree
> _______________________________________________
> DEMI mailing list
> DEMI@kkn.net
> http://loja.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/demi
>
--
73 Chris Cox N0UK, G4JEC, ex-AB0CN, ex-G8PTC RNARS #1157 EN34jv
chrisc@Chris.Org Ping Jockey's do it until they HEAR the burn...
WWW Home Page: http://WWW.Chris.Org/ http://www.pingjockey.net
Cultural observation:
Europeans think 100 miles is a long way;
Americans think 100 years is a long time!